Welcome to pink'un | pink'un Home | Forums | Sign in | Join | Settings
 

Main Discussion - Norwich City

Topic has 65 replies.

Print Search
Sort Posts:    
   09/05/2008, 11:30 PM
NCFC_Shaun is not online. Last active: 04/10/2008 19:59:38 NCFC_Shaun



Top 150 Posts
Joined on 22/12/2006
Norwich
Posts 1,672
Re: Who cares if Huckerby has gone?

yeah who cares if somebody who really cared about this club, has been our best player for 5 years and has basically made himself a city legend leaves...

not.

fair enough to say you think now was the time for him to go or what not. but to just say 'who cares' is ridiculous.


Come On Noz!!!!
   Report 
   09/05/2008, 11:43 PM
West_London_Canary is not online. Last active: 04/09/2008 12:10:03 West_London_Canary



Not Ranked
Joined on 12/04/2008
Posts 313
Re: Who cares if Huckerby has gone?

Granted that some people (small minority) have gone way over the top with the whole Hucks situation by calling for Glens head, asking to retire Hucks shirt number etc etc, but I think that you will find that were more than entitled to care about how Hucks left the club... Like I keep saying to all these drama queens who demand us fans to just forget about a player who is looked upon as a legend to so many City fans... WE WILL MOVE ON.. but for now all we ask is for the chance to give Hucks a good send off, not allowing us to do so is takeing something away from the great man himself and the loyal City fans.

 

 

 



   Report 
   10/05/2008, 12:11 AM
DonnysDoom is not online. Last active: 12/08/2008 20:50:09 DonnysDoom

Not Ranked
Joined on 07/05/2008
Posts 94
Re: Who cares if Huckerby has gone?
88.87% of Norwich City supporters according to the Evening News poll  think it was handled badly , now thats a pretty high majority.
   Report 
   10/05/2008, 12:23 AM
ricky knight is not online. Last active: 28/09/2008 23:27:21 ricky knight



Top 150 Posts
Joined on 08/01/2005
norwich
Posts 1,726
Re: Who cares if Huckerby has gone?
 Branston Pickle wrote:
 ricky knight wrote:

 The Great Revival. wrote:
Move on and get on with it.

must of taken you days to come up with that masterpost.

...at least it didn't babble on inanely, full of self importance like a lot of the 50-odd other threads about it have done!

The simple fact is that Hucks has gone.  I'd have probably kept him on for a season but to release him was not an unreasonable call by any stretch.  IMO we just have to wait and see what Roeder's plans are before we can criticise him too much for what is a footballing decision. 

It was indeed handled clumsily, and this is what has clearly disgruntled many, but I've been watching Norwich since the early 1980s and can think of lots of players who have gone from both NCFC and other clubs without any farewell when they possibly deserved better.  But that's football/life.  We don't always get what we want or think we deserve and to harp on about it ad infinitum really doesn't do much good.  As the opening comment says, it is time to move on and get on with it.

The way some people are bleating on, you'd wonder whether they support Huckerby rather than NCFC....

But why bother to start a new thread if it was not an attention seeking gimmick. Its seems there is alot of people pxssed off to how it was handled according to EEN.


   Report 
   10/05/2008, 10:06 AM
Beds Canary is not online. Last active: 28/09/2008 08:46:32 Beds Canary



Not Ranked
Joined on 01/07/2007
Bedfordshire
Posts 320
Re: Who cares if Huckerby has gone?
 The Great Revival. wrote:
Move on and get on with it.


Who cares if Huckerby has gone?

Pretty much everybody except you

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
   Report 
   10/05/2008, 10:12 AM
tribes is not online. Last active: 24/09/2008 15:34:33 tribes



Top 500 Posts
Joined on 10/09/2007
Posts 516
Re: Who cares if Huckerby has gone?

 The Great Revival. wrote:
Move on and get on with it.

The majority of supporters care. You are in a minority but then I will probably be in a minority when I say I can't wait for Roeder to go elsewhere.




   Report 
   10/05/2008, 10:26 AM
norwich_4_EPL is not online. Last active: 10/05/2008 19:27:16 norwich_4_EPL



Not Ranked
Joined on 04/04/2008
Melbourne, Australia
Posts 6
Re: Who cares if Huckerby has gone?
Look mate. I'd book yourself in to see a shrink. Huckerby is one of the greatest wingers to waltz the flanks at Carrow Road and should be immortilized with Legendary status at Carrow Road.

Kick off, throw it in, have a little scrimmage,
Keep it low, a splendid rush, bravo, win or die;
On the ball, City, never mind the danger,
Steady on, now’s your chance,
Hurrah! We’ve scored a goal.

   Report 
   10/05/2008, 10:44 AM
Mister Chops is not online. Last active: 26/09/2008 09:50:47 Mister Chops



Top 100 Posts
Joined on 23/09/2006
The Rosary Tavern
Posts 2,282
Re: Who cares if Huckerby has gone?
 The Great Revival. wrote:
Move on and get on with it.


At last, a true supporter speaks.


Never mind the danger

Sponsored by the Rosary Tavern - a fine pub for a fine city.

   Report 
   10/05/2008, 11:08 PM
scott is not online. Last active: 19/09/2008 17:45:34 scott

Not Ranked
Joined on 23/06/2007
Posts 382
Re: Who cares if Huckerby has gone?

 The Great Revival. wrote:
Move on and get on with it.

 

I care cause the Hucks is still good enough to have served us for at least another season and I fear that we're not going to get near the top of the championship when we get rid of players capable of taking us there!

 

And yes I'ved moved on like I have had to many times before in my 3 decades+ of following Norwich City FC but it doesn't mean I'll ever accept Glen Roeders hideous decision!


   Report 
   11/05/2008, 8:28 AM
Mello Yello is not online. Last active: 10/10/2008 21:41:42 Mello Yello



Top 50 Posts
Joined on 03/01/2004
Norwich
Posts 4,146
Indifferent [:|] Re: Who cares if Huckerby has gone?

I care, I think he could've still done another season at least.

I eagerly await the impending quality replacement for Huckerby - that I assume will arrive before the onset of  the new season, including additional quality reinforcements for those 'fringes' and 'youth' players, that were shown the exit-door by the club........If we do an 'Only Crofty' (very unlikely as Roeder won't accept that) who was the singular (no plural) addition to the NCFC 'limited' squad a few years back.....I will be firkin livid!

We cannot afford to downsize or accept average additions......I think that next season is going to be an entirely different 'Ball-Game' to our 3rd under-achieving season in the Championship. Totally different to the 'anyone can beat anyone' and few points between mid, bottom and top of the league positions. 

Before we hopefully reinforce our squad, who is the actually true 'quality' amongst the permanent and regulars? Without wishing to be a 'Drama Queen'. We need more than fine-tuning, we require a major-overhaul, or we will certainly struggle.

We'll miss him now he's gone......

 


"Give 'em enough rope"......
   Report 
   11/05/2008, 10:34 AM
renegade tootsie is not online. Last active: 05/10/2008 22:08:52 renegade tootsie



Top 200 Posts
Joined on 16/08/2006
Posts 1,116
Re: Who cares if Huckerby has gone?

So if Huvkerbys departure turns out for example to free up the money for a done deal on Etherington would you still be angry? 

 scott wrote:

 The Great Revival. wrote:
Move on and get on with it.

 

I care cause the Hucks is still good enough to have served us for at least another season and I fear that we're not going to get near the top of the championship when we get rid of players capable of taking us there!

 

And yes I'ved moved on like I have had to many times before in my 3 decades+ of following Norwich City FC but it doesn't mean I'll ever accept Glen Roeders hideous decision!


I SUPPORT NORWICH CITY ON THE PITCH. I WANT TO SEE BETTER PLAYERS AND MORE THAN 31% OF TURNOVER SPENT ON PLAYERS WAGES. THAT REQUIRES A NEW BOARD WITH SOME GUTS.
   Report 
   11/05/2008, 10:43 AM
ricky knight is not online. Last active: 28/09/2008 23:27:21 ricky knight



Top 150 Posts
Joined on 08/01/2005
norwich
Posts 1,726
Re: Who cares if Huckerby has gone?
still be angry at the way it was done YES.
   Report 
   11/05/2008, 4:32 PM
Potless Percy  is not online. Last active: 06/10/2008 07:16:09 Potless Percy

Top 75 Posts
Joined on 05/10/2005
attleborough
Posts 2,784
Re: Who cares if Huckerby has gone?
 Mello Yello wrote:

We cannot afford to downsize or accept average additions......I think that next season is going to be an entirely different 'Ball-Game' to our 3rd under-achieving season in the Championship. Totally different to the 'anyone can beat anyone' and few points between mid, bottom and top of the league positions. 

I agree.  This season will prove to be a tipping point imo.  The Champ will soon become like the Prem, with a gap between the clubs with new investment and those without.  If the present trend continues we can forget the top six.  Mid-table security will be the most we can achieve, if we're lucky.   Which was what was wanted as far as the board are concerned . . .

Having invested so much in protecting themselves against takeover could backfire horribly on our club.  If the finances get so desperate that we need new investment to avoid going out of business, they may bitterly regret that they've made the club so unattractive to potential investors.

 


"For a short white guy he is really FAST..." (SJE fan)
   Report 
   11/05/2008, 4:42 PM
YankeeCanary is not online. Last active: 27/09/2008 11:02:45 YankeeCanary



Top 75 Posts
Joined on 23/12/2003
New Jersey, USA
Posts 2,586
Re: Who cares if Huckerby has gone?
 Fat Prophet wrote:
 Mello Yello wrote:

We cannot afford to downsize or accept average additions......I think that next season is going to be an entirely different 'Ball-Game' to our 3rd under-achieving season in the Championship. Totally different to the 'anyone can beat anyone' and few points between mid, bottom and top of the league positions. 

I agree.  This season will prove to be a tipping point imo.  The Champ will soon become like the Prem, with a gap between the clubs with new investment and those without.  If the present trend continues we can forget the top six.  Mid-table security will be the most we can achieve, if we're lucky.   Which was what was wanted as far as the board are concerned . . .

Having invested so much in protecting themselves against takeover could backfire horribly on our club.  If the finances get so desperate that we need new investment to avoid going out of business, they may bitterly regret that they've made the club so unattractive to potential investors.

Your argument continues to fail to sustain logic Fat Prophet. Your reasoning asks that logic be suspended. Why would people who have clearly demonstrated their ability to manage their lives successfully in a financial manner operate in such a foolish way, i.e. to make their business unatttractive to others while it perches on the edge of going out of business?  


   Report 
   11/05/2008, 4:50 PM
gazzathegreat is not online. Last active: 27/09/2008 15:59:31 gazzathegreat



Top 50 Posts
Joined on 18/08/2003
Shadow of the Barclay
Posts 3,333
Re: Who cares if Huckerby has gone?
The club is not unattactive to any investor on face value; what's unattactive is the major shareholders have such a large stake in it and have a very exacting shortlist which any applicants have to comply with. Ask yourself this, if you wanted to invest say 10m, would you also not want a say in the way the club is run? At present Delia and Michael call the shots and until that changes the prospect of any new investment remains unlikely.
"Smile like you mean it"
   Report 
  Page 4 of 5 (66 items) < 1 2 3 4 5 >
pink'un » Have Your Say » Main Discussion... » Re: Who cares if Huckerby has gone?

Powered by Community Server, by Telligent Systems

Copyright © 2007 Archant Regional Limited. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditions