Search Sort Posts:  Oldest to newest Newest to oldest

15/01/2008, 3:14 PM Bigmarkcanary Joined on 16/03/2007 Beccles Posts 872 Re: How sad shack, how sad.  Arthur Whittle wrote:  Bigmarkcanary wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote:  Bigmarkcanary wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote: Hmmmmmmmmm Shacks arguments and punctuality seem to tie in perfectly with big mark canary? Not using other IDs to make yourself look clever are you old pal? I'm sorry, but how sad, pathetic and desperate can somebody get??? I have had one or two disagreements/arguments with Shack on here in the past but, unlike other people I could mention, I'm not actually sad enough within myself to start an argument in an empty room. I'm not sure whether Shack could neither - or should that be bigshackcanary in the world of Arthur Prattle?? I see that you've replied to Shack's post - interesting to see that you've come back at him with a very poor one line effort and also that you haven't denied what he's said neither. That you basically try and move the goalposts when you've lost an argument. Like I said earlier - give it up Arthur. With each post you continue to make in this thread, you are just coming over as more and more silly. So im the name caller yet you call me sad, pathetic, silly, desperate, Arthur Prattle in the same post? Practise what you preach son, practise what you preach That's because you are Arthur and everyone can see that you are because of all the stuff that you've posted in this thread. What else did you really expect Arthur? How would you have liked it if I'd posted crap like that, asking if you and Cluck were the same person using different ID's? Oh sorry, that's already been done hasn't it. As for practice what you preach, you need to do a whole lot more of that than I do. I could've called you stuff a lot worse, but that's already been done by others in this thread. I shall leave you to try and work out what that is. boo hoo,i'm so offended. If me implying you and shack are one person [which i don't it was a joke more than anything] is so upsetting to you than i apologise.Personally i think my 5 year old grandaughter would be less upset. Still never mind i'm sure you will become more thick skinned as life goes on Fine, if the best you can do is just come back at people with childish answers then you carry on old boy. You've been doing so since you first joined this forum, so why stop now hey? And if I found it so upsetting, do you not think that I would have put an or an icon in my post? Also, if I wasn't so thick-skinned, and stubborn with it, then I would've given up on this forum ages ago. But I'm still here, aren't I    Report

15/01/2008, 3:41 PM Arturo Whittoli Joined on 12/07/2007 Finding peace in Froggets ledge, Derbyshire. Posts 2,407 Re: How sad shack, how sad.  Bigmarkcanary wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote:  Bigmarkcanary wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote:  Bigmarkcanary wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote: Hmmmmmmmmm Shacks arguments and punctuality seem to tie in perfectly with big mark canary? Not using other IDs to make yourself look clever are you old pal? I'm sorry, but how sad, pathetic and desperate can somebody get??? I have had one or two disagreements/arguments with Shack on here in the past but, unlike other people I could mention, I'm not actually sad enough within myself to start an argument in an empty room. I'm not sure whether Shack could neither - or should that be bigshackcanary in the world of Arthur Prattle?? I see that you've replied to Shack's post - interesting to see that you've come back at him with a very poor one line effort and also that you haven't denied what he's said neither. That you basically try and move the goalposts when you've lost an argument. Like I said earlier - give it up Arthur. With each post you continue to make in this thread, you are just coming over as more and more silly. So im the name caller yet you call me sad, pathetic, silly, desperate, Arthur Prattle in the same post? Practise what you preach son, practise what you preach That's because you are Arthur and everyone can see that you are because of all the stuff that you've posted in this thread. What else did you really expect Arthur? How would you have liked it if I'd posted crap like that, asking if you and Cluck were the same person using different ID's? Oh sorry, that's already been done hasn't it. As for practice what you preach, you need to do a whole lot more of that than I do. I could've called you stuff a lot worse, but that's already been done by others in this thread. I shall leave you to try and work out what that is. boo hoo,i'm so offended. If me implying you and shack are one person [which i don't it was a joke more than anything] is so upsetting to you than i apologise.Personally i think my 5 year old grandaughter would be less upset. Still never mind i'm sure you will become more thick skinned as life goes on Fine, if the best you can do is just come back at people with childish answers then you carry on old boy. You've been doing so since you first joined this forum, so why stop now hey? And if I found it so upsetting, do you not think that I would have put an or an icon in my post? Also, if I wasn't so thick-skinned, and stubborn with it, then I would've given up on this forum ages ago. But I'm still here, aren't I Lets be honest mark,im not the only one doing the name calling on here am i? It  seems you choose to ignores others if it suits your opinion. And as for the childish reply....erm, again you seem to ignore the childish reply i was replying too. Yes it was yours Mark!    Report

15/01/2008, 4:21 PM jas the barclay king Joined on 02/11/2003 Posts 9,453 Re: How sad shack, how sad.  Arthur Whittle wrote:  jas the barclay king wrote: wonder if Arthur has a picture of Hitler beside the bed? jas :) No sorry and I've no time for Hitler. Do you have a nice piccy of George Galloway? You miss the fine line between Racism and patriotism, its a common mistake made by the younger generations after constantly being told its bad to be British.   oh the Irony! i'll leave u to work it out Arthur.... and as for being bad to be British... have a look at the lyrics to the song "this is great britain" by the Holloways, and "downing Street Kindling" by Larrakin Love if u want to see why this countrys gone down the pan.. might post them on here after work tonight. jas :)    Report

15/01/2008, 5:01 PM kick it off Joined on 15/11/2005 Posts 723 Re: How many IDs does Shack Attack have?  Arthur Whittle wrote:  kick it off wrote: Doubtful AW, just because they punctuate and spell properly, does not make them one and the same, merely shows a level of education, and competence. Today's paper reveals Poles score highest on Britishness test introduced by home office, ahead of swedes, danes and of course, BRITS. what do you make of this? As for ganging up on you Arthur, you sound like Hillary Clinton after Obama and Edwards "ganged up" on her, your definition of "ganging up" seems to be the same, two people putting across reasoned arguments that agree and complement each other in response to your deluded ramblings constitute "ganging up" ARE YOU IN FACT HILLARY CLINTON, USING ANOTHER ID IN A BID TO MAKE YOURSELF APPEAR MORE WORLDLY?!" src="../emoticons/emotion-4.gif"> Ever thought for one minute the reason British people have a small grasp of Britishness is because people like you are forever telling them its wrong to be proud of our culture? It happens in schools everyday matey and dont insult me by saying it doesn't. You even sum it up in your post by saying 'And of course,BRITS'. Like I've said it all stinks of the self loathing left. The hatred towards the system makes me laugh yet you all bite the hand that feeds you. Hypocritical to the max. No Arthur, you are wrong. I am not insulting you, or even trying to. i have been to school about 50years more recently than you, so i have a real idea what goes on, not just a deluded fabrication constructed from the small incorrect facts i can garner from the Daily Mail. Moreover, i find it offensive to myself, that you seem to think you know more about schools and MY generation than I do. You are clearly not a part of this generation, as if you were,  you may have some understanding of what ACTUALLY goes on. I have never said it is wrong for Brits to be proud of being British, please quote me on it and i will apologise, but you will not find any such comment, as it is just you misconstruing my words in a bid to make me appear anti-british. This is not the case, as you should well know, I have merely said, that it is wrong for Brits to be racist, and that it is wrong for Brits to deny other cultures the opportunity to express their beliefs and values. I put the word "BRITS" in capitals in that context as you are always harping on about how the foreigners come here, don't speak our language, steal our jobs, etc yet they clearly do speak our language, and not only that they finished well ahead of Brits in a test on Britishness. It was to accentuate my point that Brits are behind other countries on tests of Britishness. I don't understand how you are trying to manipulate me using upper case for the word "Brits" into an advert for the "self-loathing left"...? Please feel free to elaborate (Of course you won't, you merely retort with a one line respinse, probably not really associated with this post at all) And finally, A) I don't hate the system - surely you have displayed more vitriol towards those "hypocritical, self loathing lefties" that are currently in charge? I voted Labour to keep the tories and the sort of parties you have already pledged your support for, OUT OF GOVERNMENT. Labour are not ideal, but they are a damn sight better than having the British Nazi Party in charge!!  Does this mean i hate the system more than you? B) Bite the hand that feeds? Do i bite my own hands then? I have NEVER claimed a single benefit, even when entitled to do so. Additionally, Surely if anyone is "biting the hand that feeds" it is yourself as the "hand that feeds YOU" was created by a liberal government, you know, the sort you find utterly abhorrant.... not those right wingers you so love. AND YOU ARE ACCUSING ME OF BEING HYPOCRITICAL..?    Report

15/01/2008, 5:49 PM Bigmarkcanary Joined on 16/03/2007 Beccles Posts 872 Re: How sad shack, how sad.  Arthur Whittle wrote:  Bigmarkcanary wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote:  Bigmarkcanary wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote:  Bigmarkcanary wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote: Hmmmmmmmmm Shacks arguments and punctuality seem to tie in perfectly with big mark canary? Not using other IDs to make yourself look clever are you old pal? I'm sorry, but how sad, pathetic and desperate can somebody get??? I have had one or two disagreements/arguments with Shack on here in the past but, unlike other people I could mention, I'm not actually sad enough within myself to start an argument in an empty room. I'm not sure whether Shack could neither - or should that be bigshackcanary in the world of Arthur Prattle?? I see that you've replied to Shack's post - interesting to see that you've come back at him with a very poor one line effort and also that you haven't denied what he's said neither. That you basically try and move the goalposts when you've lost an argument. Like I said earlier - give it up Arthur. With each post you continue to make in this thread, you are just coming over as more and more silly. So im the name caller yet you call me sad, pathetic, silly, desperate, Arthur Prattle in the same post? Practise what you preach son, practise what you preach That's because you are Arthur and everyone can see that you are because of all the stuff that you've posted in this thread. What else did you really expect Arthur? How would you have liked it if I'd posted crap like that, asking if you and Cluck were the same person using different ID's? Oh sorry, that's already been done hasn't it. As for practice what you preach, you need to do a whole lot more of that than I do. I could've called you stuff a lot worse, but that's already been done by others in this thread. I shall leave you to try and work out what that is. boo hoo,i'm so offended. If me implying you and shack are one person [which i don't it was a joke more than anything] is so upsetting to you than i apologise.Personally i think my 5 year old grandaughter would be less upset. Still never mind i'm sure you will become more thick skinned as life goes on Fine, if the best you can do is just come back at people with childish answers then you carry on old boy. You've been doing so since you first joined this forum, so why stop now hey? And if I found it so upsetting, do you not think that I would have put an or an icon in my post? Also, if I wasn't so thick-skinned, and stubborn with it, then I would've given up on this forum ages ago. But I'm still here, aren't I Lets be honest mark,im not the only one doing the name calling on here am i? It  seems you choose to ignores others if it suits your opinion. And as for the childish reply....erm, again you seem to ignore the childish reply i was replying too. Yes it was yours Mark! Granted, you're not, but who was the first to start the name calling on this thread Arthur? If you back straight to page 1, I think you'll find it wasn't me. Yes, I would normally choose to ignore others if it suits my opinion. But that's not always the case. I might post and say 'Great post, I 100% agree', other times I ignore them by not replying to them. But I still read them . When you say 'the childish reply i was replying to', do you mean the text that I've highlighted? If so, that wasn't childish, that was factual. As is the rest of that post, if you read it carefully.      Report

15/01/2008, 10:36 PM Graham Humphrey Joined on 21/06/2007 Norwich Posts 1,853 Re: How sad shack, how sad.  Arthur Whittle wrote: You miss the fine line between Racism and patriotism Judging by your posts, so do you...    Report

16/01/2008, 9:43 AM Arturo Whittoli Joined on 12/07/2007 Finding peace in Froggets ledge, Derbyshire. Posts 2,407 Re: How sad shack, how sad.  Graham Humphrey wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote: You miss the fine line between Racism and patriotism Judging by your posts, so do you... And you sir are a disgrace to your country.    Report

16/01/2008, 9:44 AM Arturo Whittoli Joined on 12/07/2007 Finding peace in Froggets ledge, Derbyshire. Posts 2,407 Re: How sad shack, how sad.  Bigmarkcanary wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote:  Bigmarkcanary wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote:  Bigmarkcanary wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote:  Bigmarkcanary wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote: Hmmmmmmmmm Shacks arguments and punctuality seem to tie in perfectly with big mark canary? Not using other IDs to make yourself look clever are you old pal? I'm sorry, but how sad, pathetic and desperate can somebody get??? I have had one or two disagreements/arguments with Shack on here in the past but, unlike other people I could mention, I'm not actually sad enough within myself to start an argument in an empty room. I'm not sure whether Shack could neither - or should that be bigshackcanary in the world of Arthur Prattle?? I see that you've replied to Shack's post - interesting to see that you've come back at him with a very poor one line effort and also that you haven't denied what he's said neither. That you basically try and move the goalposts when you've lost an argument. Like I said earlier - give it up Arthur. With each post you continue to make in this thread, you are just coming over as more and more silly. So im the name caller yet you call me sad, pathetic, silly, desperate, Arthur Prattle in the same post? Practise what you preach son, practise what you preach That's because you are Arthur and everyone can see that you are because of all the stuff that you've posted in this thread. What else did you really expect Arthur? How would you have liked it if I'd posted crap like that, asking if you and Cluck were the same person using different ID's? Oh sorry, that's already been done hasn't it. As for practice what you preach, you need to do a whole lot more of that than I do. I could've called you stuff a lot worse, but that's already been done by others in this thread. I shall leave you to try and work out what that is. boo hoo,i'm so offended. If me implying you and shack are one person [which i don't it was a joke more than anything] is so upsetting to you than i apologise.Personally i think my 5 year old grandaughter would be less upset. Still never mind i'm sure you will become more thick skinned as life goes on Fine, if the best you can do is just come back at people with childish answers then you carry on old boy. You've been doing so since you first joined this forum, so why stop now hey? And if I found it so upsetting, do you not think that I would have put an or an icon in my post? Also, if I wasn't so thick-skinned, and stubborn with it, then I would've given up on this forum ages ago. But I'm still here, aren't I Lets be honest mark,im not the only one doing the name calling on here am i? It  seems you choose to ignores others if it suits your opinion. And as for the childish reply....erm, again you seem to ignore the childish reply i was replying too. Yes it was yours Mark! Granted, you're not, but who was the first to start the name calling on this thread Arthur? If you back straight to page 1, I think you'll find it wasn't me. Yes, I would normally choose to ignore others if it suits my opinion. But that's not always the case. I might post and say 'Great post, I 100% agree', other times I ignore them by not replying to them. But I still read them . When you say 'the childish reply i was replying to', do you mean the text that I've highlighted? If so, that wasn't childish, that was factual. As is the rest of that post, if you read it carefully.   So you often embark on childish tit for tat snipes then?    Report

16/01/2008, 9:47 AM Arturo Whittoli Joined on 12/07/2007 Finding peace in Froggets ledge, Derbyshire. Posts 2,407 Re: How many IDs does Shack Attack have?  kick it off wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote:  kick it off wrote: Doubtful AW, just because they punctuate and spell properly, does not make them one and the same, merely shows a level of education, and competence. Today's paper reveals Poles score highest on Britishness test introduced by home office, ahead of swedes, danes and of course, BRITS. what do you make of this? As for ganging up on you Arthur, you sound like Hillary Clinton after Obama and Edwards "ganged up" on her, your definition of "ganging up" seems to be the same, two people putting across reasoned arguments that agree and complement each other in response to your deluded ramblings constitute "ganging up" ARE YOU IN FACT HILLARY CLINTON, USING ANOTHER ID IN A BID TO MAKE YOURSELF APPEAR MORE WORLDLY?!" src="../emoticons/emotion-4.gif"> Ever thought for one minute the reason British people have a small grasp of Britishness is because people like you are forever telling them its wrong to be proud of our culture? It happens in schools everyday matey and dont insult me by saying it doesn't. You even sum it up in your post by saying 'And of course,BRITS'. Like I've said it all stinks of the self loathing left. The hatred towards the system makes me laugh yet you all bite the hand that feeds you. Hypocritical to the max. No Arthur, you are wrong. I am not insulting you, or even trying to. i have been to school about 50years more recently than you, so i have a real idea what goes on, not just a deluded fabrication constructed from the small incorrect facts i can garner from the Daily Mail. Moreover, i find it offensive to myself, that you seem to think you know more about schools and MY generation than I do. You are clearly not a part of this generation, as if you were,  you may have some understanding of what ACTUALLY goes on. I have never said it is wrong for Brits to be proud of being British, please quote me on it and i will apologise, but you will not find any such comment, as it is just you misconstruing my words in a bid to make me appear anti-british. This is not the case, as you should well know, I have merely said, that it is wrong for Brits to be racist, and that it is wrong for Brits to deny other cultures the opportunity to express their beliefs and values. I put the word "BRITS" in capitals in that context as you are always harping on about how the foreigners come here, don't speak our language, steal our jobs, etc yet they clearly do speak our language, and not only that they finished well ahead of Brits in a test on Britishness. It was to accentuate my point that Brits are behind other countries on tests of Britishness. I don't understand how you are trying to manipulate me using upper case for the word "Brits" into an advert for the "self-loathing left"...? Please feel free to elaborate (Of course you won't, you merely retort with a one line respinse, probably not really associated with this post at all) And finally, A) I don't hate the system - surely you have displayed more vitriol towards those "hypocritical, self loathing lefties" that are currently in charge? I voted Labour to keep the tories and the sort of parties you have already pledged your support for, OUT OF GOVERNMENT. Labour are not ideal, but they are a damn sight better than having the British Nazi Party in charge!!  Does this mean i hate the system more than you? B) Bite the hand that feeds? Do i bite my own hands then? I have NEVER claimed a single benefit, even when entitled to do so. Additionally, Surely if anyone is "biting the hand that feeds" it is yourself as the "hand that feeds YOU" was created by a liberal government, you know, the sort you find utterly abhorrant.... not those right wingers you so love. AND YOU ARE ACCUSING ME OF BEING HYPOCRITICAL..? Firstly, what is your obsession with me and the right wing just because i see more sense in the BNPs policies than other partys? 2nd yes you probably know more about YOUR generations schooling, but i know more about MY eras schooling.    Report

16/01/2008, 9:47 AM Arturo Whittoli Joined on 12/07/2007 Finding peace in Froggets ledge, Derbyshire. Posts 2,407 Re: How sad shack, how sad.  jas the barclay king wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote:  jas the barclay king wrote: wonder if Arthur has a picture of Hitler beside the bed? jas :) No sorry and I've no time for Hitler. Do you have a nice piccy of George Galloway? You miss the fine line between Racism and patriotism, its a common mistake made by the younger generations after constantly being told its bad to be British.   oh the Irony! i'll leave u to work it out Arthur.... and as for being bad to be British... have a look at the lyrics to the song "this is great britain" by the Holloways, and "downing Street Kindling" by Larrakin Love if u want to see why this countrys gone down the pan.. might post them on here after work tonight. jas :) How ironic!    Report

16/01/2008, 10:29 AM Graham Humphrey Joined on 21/06/2007 Norwich Posts 1,853 Re: How sad shack, how sad.  Arthur Whittle wrote:  Graham Humphrey wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote: You miss the fine line between Racism and patriotism Judging by your posts, so do you... And you sir are a disgrace to your country. So I'm a disgrace for not being racist? Nice. Bit difficult to show respect towards the army if people like you are in it, isn't it Arthur?    Report

16/01/2008, 1:11 PM Old Yellow Bird Joined on 31/08/2004 Norwich Posts 102 Re: Shack Attack scraping the barrell......again!  Arthur Whittle wrote:  Old Yellow Bird wrote: can't remember any of the organisations on your list putting up candidates at general elections Arthur.  That's the difference between them and the BNP. You didn't put the Mothers' Union,  Stonewall or Greenpeace on the list - they all represent very specific groups as well..................... Do you have the same issues with every political party across this planet that promotes the well being and culture of the indigenous people? Every country has one you know? India,Pakistan,Kenya,south Africa, Papua new Guinea! Read up on whats going on in South Africa as we speak. I bet you where all hugging Mandela when he was promoting the ANC but now the white families are in the same boat as the Black population was, it all goes quiet. Why no rallies in Trafalgar Square in support of the White farmers in Zimbabwe? All very double standard is it not? Whats so wrong in being proud of MY culture,history and race?  As for Greenpeace and stonewall etc etc, they might represent groups but not race. Do you think i could get away with the 'Norwich society of White English patriots'? I doubt it would get government funding do you?!! Sorry it's taken so long to wade through the welter of emails and reply.  When I was at school - most likely the same time as you Arthur - I remember learning that to be able to have a debate/argument/discussion with someone, there had to be an agreement about terminology.  That means to discuss your phrase "the indigenous people" with reference to Britain (or England, or Norfolk even) we would have to agree what it means. Over to you: please define what you mean by the "indigenous people" of Britain.   Never mind the danger..............    Report

16/01/2008, 5:10 PM Arturo Whittoli Joined on 12/07/2007 Finding peace in Froggets ledge, Derbyshire. Posts 2,407 Re: Shack Attack scraping the barrell......again!  Old Yellow Bird wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote:  Old Yellow Bird wrote: can't remember any of the organisations on your list putting up candidates at general elections Arthur.  That's the difference between them and the BNP. You didn't put the Mothers' Union,  Stonewall or Greenpeace on the list - they all represent very specific groups as well..................... Do you have the same issues with every political party across this planet that promotes the well being and culture of the indigenous people? Every country has one you know? India,Pakistan,Kenya,south Africa, Papua new Guinea! Read up on whats going on in South Africa as we speak. I bet you where all hugging Mandela when he was promoting the ANC but now the white families are in the same boat as the Black population was, it all goes quiet. Why no rallies in Trafalgar Square in support of the White farmers in Zimbabwe? All very double standard is it not? Whats so wrong in being proud of MY culture,history and race?  As for Greenpeace and stonewall etc etc, they might represent groups but not race. Do you think i could get away with the 'Norwich society of White English patriots'? I doubt it would get government funding do you?!! Sorry it's taken so long to wade through the welter of emails and reply.  When I was at school - most likely the same time as you Arthur - I remember learning that to be able to have a debate/argument/discussion with someone, there had to be an agreement about terminology.  That means to discuss your phrase "the indigenous people" with reference to Britain (or England, or Norfolk even) we would have to agree what it means. Over to you: please define what you mean by the "indigenous people" of Britain.   Well as you are no doubt aware the term indigenous has no one meaning but i would argue the case of the place of your birth and the culture it represents,all  of which is being eroded by influence of others. Whilst on the subject of different cultural influence and the backlash and distrust it causes, i noticed today that the US government has said the biggest risk of terrorism to western culture and way of life is from Western Europe and most notably from Britain.....how wonderful multi cultism is turning out to be hey?!    Report

16/01/2008, 6:49 PM Arturo Whittoli Joined on 12/07/2007 Finding peace in Froggets ledge, Derbyshire. Posts 2,407 Re: How sad shack, how sad.  Graham Humphrey wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote:  Graham Humphrey wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote: You miss the fine line between Racism and patriotism Judging by your posts, so do you... And you sir are a disgrace to your country. So I'm a disgrace for not being racist? Nice. Bit difficult to show respect towards the army if people like you are in it, isn't it Arthur? Firstly i was IN the Army and secondly just because you dont like what i say, you go on to say its hard to respect the army because of it! Well in that case we better question every person who enters carrow rd on match day, because,god forbid if someone who has a different opinion to you means you surely couldnt repect the club on a whole!!    Report

16/01/2008, 7:12 PM Graham Humphrey Joined on 21/06/2007 Norwich Posts 1,853 Re: How sad shack, how sad.  Arthur Whittle wrote:  Graham Humphrey wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote:  Graham Humphrey wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote: You miss the fine line between Racism and patriotism Judging by your posts, so do you... And you sir are a disgrace to your country. So I'm a disgrace for not being racist? Nice. Bit difficult to show respect towards the army if people like you are in it, isn't it Arthur? Firstly i was IN the Army and secondly just because you dont like what i say, you go on to say its hard to respect the army because of it! Well in that case we better question every person who enters carrow rd on match day, because,god forbid if someone who has a different opinion to you means you surely couldnt repect the club on a whole!! Well, indeed. Now try taking some of your own advice.    Report

Page 22 of 26 (385 items) « First ... < 20 21 22 23 24 > ... Last »

pink'un » Have Your Say » It's not just f... » bangura of watford deported

(Quick links) Forums Home |- Search Forums |- Active Topics |- Unanswered Posts User Options |- Sign In |- Join this community |- Forgot Password Have Your Say |- Announcement |- Main Discussion - Norwich City |-- Transfer Talk |- Other football |-- Huckerby at San Jose |- King's Lynn and Local Leagues |- It's not just football! |- User Polls Football Community |- Looking for a club or player? |- Noticeboard |- Football Chants |- Team-mates