Search Sort Posts:  Oldest to newest Newest to oldest

14/01/2008, 10:15 PM Bigmarkcanary Joined on 16/03/2007 Beccles Posts 902 Re: Shack Attack scraping the barrell......again!  Arthur Whittle wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote: The enemies of British Nationalism continue to parrot the claim that the BNP is a “racist party.” This claim is most often repeated because the BNP unashamedly addresses itself to the issues and concerns of the indigenous British population, and because it seeks to ensure that British people remain the majority population in this country.  Opponents point to the fact that the BNP has an all-white membership, and that we address issues concerning white people. If the BNP is racist for holding this position, then, I would suggest, all of the following organisations - some of them state funded - are also “racist” because they too address themselves exclusively to the issues and concerns of their respective communities: 1. Watford Asian Community care 2. Watford African Caribbean Association 3. National Black Police Association 4. Metropolitan Black Police Association 5. Black Londoners Forum 6. Black Information Link (BLINK) 7. Operation Black Vote 8. Federation of Black Housing Organisations (FBHO) 9. Black Training Enterprise Group 10. Southwark Black Heritage Organisation 11. The Action Group for Irish Youth 12. Asians In Media (AIM) 13. Barfi Culture (Asians) 14. Black Britain 15. Black Enterprise 16. Black net Community 17. The Black Presence In Britain 18. Black Search 19. Black UK Online 20. Board Of Deputies of British Jews 21. Chinatown Online 22. Clickwalla (Asian) 23. Dimsum (Chinese) 24. Doncaster Chinese 25. CEMVO 26. Every Generation (Black) 27. Jewish.Co.UK 28. Jewish Telegraph 29. MMLondon (Asian) 30. Red Hot Curry (Asian) 31. National Association of Nigerian Communities - UK (NANC) 32. Barnsley Black and Ethic Minority Initiative Have you noticed how the media NEVER calls any of these organisations “racist” even though they are openly organised along ethnic lines and stand for the rights of their respective communities? It seems as if every group has the right to have an organisation speaking up for its rights - EXCEPT the indigenous British people. In reality, none of these organisations are “racist” — each and every community has the inalienable right to look after its own interests. This includes the indigenous British folk, and the BNP is proud to be the party which stands up for the rights our folk and country, in exactly the same way that all of the above organisations stand up for their folk. Yet if you highlight the inequalities these organisations throw up, you are then labelled as a racist or trouble maker. Nice to see that the BNP supports organisations doing the same sort of work for Native Britons. I’ve always wondered how big an uproar there’d be if the following were started / publicised-   White entertainment television (BET – Black Entertainment television, US TV channel) Music of White origin awards (Music of Black Origin Awards – MOBO’s) Miss White America / England (Miss Black America} So please shack and Big mack  tell me what your thought are on this argument that you have all chosen to ignore? Bit too clever for you is it? Please don't try and insult my intelligence again Arthur, you're not very good at it. Just because I've not replied to it, that doesn not mean that I've ignored it. And if I was to post my thoughts on it, and my thoughts on you, then I would only be repeating what has already been said on this thread, probably more than once. Shame about what poor Bangoura had to go through wasn't it?    Report

14/01/2008, 10:34 PM Bigmarkcanary Joined on 16/03/2007 Beccles Posts 902 Re: How many IDs does Shack Attack have?  Arthur Whittle wrote: Hmmmmmmmmm Shacks arguments and punctuality seem to tie in perfectly with big mark canary? Not using other IDs to make yourself look clever are you old pal? I'm sorry, but how sad, pathetic and desperate can somebody get??? I have had one or two disagreements/arguments with Shack on here in the past but, unlike other people I could mention, I'm not actually sad enough within myself to start an argument in an empty room. I'm not sure whether Shack could neither - or should that be bigshackcanary in the world of Arthur Prattle?? I see that you've replied to Shack's post - interesting to see that you've come back at him with a very poor one line effort and also that you haven't denied what he's said neither. That you basically try and move the goalposts when you've lost an argument. Like I said earlier - give it up Arthur. With each post you continue to make in this thread, you are just coming over as more and more silly.    Report

14/01/2008, 11:04 PM Bigmarkcanary Joined on 16/03/2007 Beccles Posts 902 Bangura wins his appeal - is Arthur happy?? Watford midfielder Al Bangura has been granted that will allow him to stay in England. Bangura looked set to be deported to his native Sierra Leone after he was controversially refused asylum in December. However, he appealed against his decision and a committee of three Home Office officials has now ruled in his favour. The Championship club were handed the unusual option of a work permit, and that has now been granted. "As a club we are very happy with the news, but most of all we are delighted for Al and his family," Watford chairman Graham Simpson told the club's official website. "We always knew he had a strong case and despite our setbacks we knew we had to fight for what we believed to be right for this young man. "Al will now contribute to our society, which I know he feels a debt of gratitude towards." Taken from Sky Sports. I'm very pleased for the young lad, now he can settle here and concentrate on getting over his injuries. Are you pleased for him as well Arthur?    Report

15/01/2008, 9:34 AM Shack Attack Joined on 11/08/2005 Making a fool of Terry Butcher Posts 1,724 Re: Winston Churchill must be turning in his grave!  Arthur Whittle wrote: Hmmmmmmmmm Shacks arguments and punctuality seem to tie in perfectly with big mark canary? Not using other IDs to make yourself look clever are you old pal? Oh dear Arthur, and you have the cheek to accuse me of scraping the barrel. I'm sure the mods can clear up that little question for you if you so wish. Nice to see I have the same punctuality as Big Mark though, I simply can't abide lateness. That was what you meant wasn't it . By the way, I didn't answer your post about all of the black and asian groups because I was sick of your continual moving of the goalposts. If you want to believe that it was bacause you were too clever for me though, I'll let you have that one if it makes you feel good about yourself. Why do you think that people felt the need to set up these groups in the first place? "The ball is round. The game lasts ninety minutes. This much is fact. Everything else is pure theory."    Report

15/01/2008, 9:52 AM Arthur Whittle Joined on 12/07/2007 Boycotting The Coachmakers, after Roys shananagans Posts 2,560 Re: Winston Churchill must be turning in his grave!  Shack Attack wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote: Hmmmmmmmmm Shacks arguments and punctuality seem to tie in perfectly with big mark canary? Not using other IDs to make yourself look clever are you old pal? Oh dear Arthur, and you have the cheek to accuse me of scraping the barrel. I'm sure the mods can clear up that little question for you if you so wish. Nice to see I have the same punctuality as Big Mark though, I simply can't abide lateness. That was what you meant wasn't it . By the way, I didn't answer your post about all of the black and asian groups because I was sick of your continual moving of the goalposts. If you want to believe that it was bacause you were too clever for me though, I'll let you have that one if it makes you feel good about yourself. Why do you think that people felt the need to set up these groups in the first place? Ahhhh the old goalposts hey? Errmm,so i'm moving them am i? Oh well, the lads here now so good luck to him and his family. Anyone watch Panorama lastnight? Its amazing how many rich European countries they creep through to get to the hunny pot isn't it?    Report

15/01/2008, 10:03 AM Arthur Whittle Joined on 12/07/2007 Boycotting The Coachmakers, after Roys shananagans Posts 2,560 Re: How many IDs does Shack Attack have?  kick it off wrote: Doubtful AW, just because they punctuate and spell properly, does not make them one and the same, merely shows a level of education, and competence. Today's paper reveals Poles score highest on Britishness test introduced by home office, ahead of swedes, danes and of course, BRITS. what do you make of this? As for ganging up on you Arthur, you sound like Hillary Clinton after Obama and Edwards "ganged up" on her, your definition of "ganging up" seems to be the same, two people putting across reasoned arguments that agree and complement each other in response to your deluded ramblings constitute "ganging up" ARE YOU IN FACT HILLARY CLINTON, USING ANOTHER ID IN A BID TO MAKE YOURSELF APPEAR MORE WORLDLY?!" src="../emoticons/emotion-4.gif"> Ever thought for one minute the reason British people have a small grasp of Britishness is because people like you are forever telling them its wrong to be proud of our culture? It happens in schools everyday matey and dont insult me by saying it doesn't. You even sum it up in your post by saying 'And of course,BRITS'. Like I've said it all stinks of the self loathing left. The hatred towards the system makes me laugh yet you all bite the hand that feeds you. Hypocritical to the max.    Report

15/01/2008, 10:21 AM Arthur Whittle Joined on 12/07/2007 Boycotting The Coachmakers, after Roys shananagans Posts 2,560 Re: Shack Attack scraping the barrell......again!  Old Yellow Bird wrote: can't remember any of the organisations on your list putting up candidates at general elections Arthur.  That's the difference between them and the BNP. You didn't put the Mothers' Union,  Stonewall or Greenpeace on the list - they all represent very specific groups as well..................... Do you have the same issues with every political party across this planet that promotes the well being and culture of the indigenous people? Every country has one you know? India,Pakistan,Kenya,south Africa, Papua new Guinea! Read up on whats going on in South Africa as we speak. I bet you where all hugging Mandela when he was promoting the ANC but now the white families are in the same boat as the Black population was, it all goes quiet. Why no rallies in Trafalgar Square in support of the White farmers in Zimbabwe? All very double standard is it not? Whats so wrong in being proud of MY culture,history and race?  As for Greenpeace and stonewall etc etc, they might represent groups but not race. Do you think i could get away with the 'Norwich society of White English patriots'? I doubt it would get government funding do you?!!    Report

15/01/2008, 10:30 AM Arthur Whittle Joined on 12/07/2007 Boycotting The Coachmakers, after Roys shananagans Posts 2,560 How sad shack, how sad.  Bigmarkcanary wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote: Hmmmmmmmmm Shacks arguments and punctuality seem to tie in perfectly with big mark canary? Not using other IDs to make yourself look clever are you old pal? I'm sorry, but how sad, pathetic and desperate can somebody get??? I have had one or two disagreements/arguments with Shack on here in the past but, unlike other people I could mention, I'm not actually sad enough within myself to start an argument in an empty room. I'm not sure whether Shack could neither - or should that be bigshackcanary in the world of Arthur Prattle?? I see that you've replied to Shack's post - interesting to see that you've come back at him with a very poor one line effort and also that you haven't denied what he's said neither. That you basically try and move the goalposts when you've lost an argument. Like I said earlier - give it up Arthur. With each post you continue to make in this thread, you are just coming over as more and more silly. So im the name caller yet you call me sad, pathetic, silly, desperate, Arthur Prattle in the same post? Practise what you preach son, practise what you preach    Report

15/01/2008, 12:01 PM Bigmarkcanary Joined on 16/03/2007 Beccles Posts 902 Re: How sad shack, how sad.  Arthur Whittle wrote:  Bigmarkcanary wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote: Hmmmmmmmmm Shacks arguments and punctuality seem to tie in perfectly with big mark canary? Not using other IDs to make yourself look clever are you old pal? I'm sorry, but how sad, pathetic and desperate can somebody get??? I have had one or two disagreements/arguments with Shack on here in the past but, unlike other people I could mention, I'm not actually sad enough within myself to start an argument in an empty room. I'm not sure whether Shack could neither - or should that be bigshackcanary in the world of Arthur Prattle?? I see that you've replied to Shack's post - interesting to see that you've come back at him with a very poor one line effort and also that you haven't denied what he's said neither. That you basically try and move the goalposts when you've lost an argument. Like I said earlier - give it up Arthur. With each post you continue to make in this thread, you are just coming over as more and more silly. So im the name caller yet you call me sad, pathetic, silly, desperate, Arthur Prattle in the same post? Practise what you preach son, practise what you preach That's because you are Arthur and everyone can see that you are because of all the stuff that you've posted in this thread. What else did you really expect Arthur? How would you have liked it if I'd posted crap like that, asking if you and Cluck were the same person using different ID's? Oh sorry, that's already been done hasn't it. As for practice what you preach, you need to do a whole lot more of that than I do. I could've called you stuff a lot worse, but that's already been done by others in this thread. I shall leave you to try and work out what that is.    Report

15/01/2008, 12:31 PM Shack Attack Joined on 11/08/2005 Making a fool of Terry Butcher Posts 1,724 Re: How many IDs does Shack Attack have? Oh well Arthur in close to 800 posts I've never had anyone accuse me of having multiple usernames, I guess I should be flattered. However, I can't be arsed to debate with somebody who resorts to that sort of nonsense when they're running out of ideas. This thread has moved on from the original topic so much that it's hard to remember what it was originally about but it's a rather sad indictment of your attitude that it's ended so childishly. There's very little else to say on any of the many subjects we've covered but I'll end my input like this. I'm a white, English, heterosexual, football loving, working class man with a wife, two children and a keen interest in British history. I've lived in Norwich like you, London like you and have also spent some time abroad. So as you can see, if you forget our obvious age difference, we've got a fair bit in common. Bearing that in mine, the one thing I can't understand is this. What one factor is causing you to believe that our country needs saving by the BNP that is obviously missing in me? "The ball is round. The game lasts ninety minutes. This much is fact. Everything else is pure theory."    Report

15/01/2008, 12:38 PM Arthur Whittle Joined on 12/07/2007 Boycotting The Coachmakers, after Roys shananagans Posts 2,560 Re: How sad shack, how sad.  Bigmarkcanary wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote:  Bigmarkcanary wrote:  Arthur Whittle wrote: Hmmmmmmmmm Shacks arguments and punctuality seem to tie in perfectly with big mark canary? Not using other IDs to make yourself look clever are you old pal? I'm sorry, but how sad, pathetic and desperate can somebody get??? I have had one or two disagreements/arguments with Shack on here in the past but, unlike other people I could mention, I'm not actually sad enough within myself to start an argument in an empty room. I'm not sure whether Shack could neither - or should that be bigshackcanary in the world of Arthur Prattle?? I see that you've replied to Shack's post - interesting to see that you've come back at him with a very poor one line effort and also that you haven't denied what he's said neither. That you basically try and move the goalposts when you've lost an argument. Like I said earlier - give it up Arthur. With each post you continue to make in this thread, you are just coming over as more and more silly. So im the name caller yet you call me sad, pathetic, silly, desperate, Arthur Prattle in the same post? Practise what you preach son, practise what you preach That's because you are Arthur and everyone can see that you are because of all the stuff that you've posted in this thread. What else did you really expect Arthur? How would you have liked it if I'd posted crap like that, asking if you and Cluck were the same person using different ID's? Oh sorry, that's already been done hasn't it. As for practice what you preach, you need to do a whole lot more of that than I do. I could've called you stuff a lot worse, but that's already been done by others in this thread. I shall leave you to try and work out what that is. boo hoo,i'm so offended. If me implying you and shack are one person [which i don't it was a joke more than anything] is so upsetting to you than i apologise.Personally i think my 5 year old grandaughter would be less upset. Still never mind i'm sure you will become more thick skinned as life goes on    Report

15/01/2008, 2:29 PM jas the barclay king Joined on 02/11/2003 Posts 10,188 Re: How sad shack, how sad. wonder if Arthur has a picture of Hitler beside the bed? jas :)    Report

15/01/2008, 2:41 PM Arthur Whittle Joined on 12/07/2007 Boycotting The Coachmakers, after Roys shananagans Posts 2,560 Re: Bangura wins his appeal - is Arthur happy??  Bigmarkcanary wrote: Watford midfielder Al Bangura has been granted that will allow him to stay in England. Bangura looked set to be deported to his native Sierra Leone after he was controversially refused asylum in December. However, he appealed against his decision and a committee of three Home Office officials has now ruled in his favour. The Championship club were handed the unusual option of a work permit, and that has now been granted. "As a club we are very happy with the news, but most of all we are delighted for Al and his family," Watford chairman Graham Simpson told the club's official website. "We always knew he had a strong case and despite our setbacks we knew we had to fight for what we believed to be right for this young man. "Al will now contribute to our society, which I know he feels a debt of gratitude towards." Taken from Sky Sports. I'm very pleased for the young lad, now he can settle here and concentrate on getting over his injuries. Are you pleased for him as well Arthur? No im not pleased why would i be? If we let everyone from a worn torn country live here where the hell are we supposed to live? The home office should have stuck to there guns and not bowed to pressure. This just opens the bloody floodgates.    Report

15/01/2008, 2:50 PM Arthur Whittle Joined on 12/07/2007 Boycotting The Coachmakers, after Roys shananagans Posts 2,560 Re: How many IDs does Shack Attack have?  Shack Attack wrote: Oh well Arthur in close to 800 posts I've never had anyone accuse me of having multiple usernames, I guess I should be flattered. However, I can't be arsed to debate with somebody who resorts to that sort of nonsense when they're running out of ideas. This thread has moved on from the original topic so much that it's hard to remember what it was originally about but it's a rather sad indictment of your attitude that it's ended so childishly. There's very little else to say on any of the many subjects we've covered but I'll end my input like this. I'm a white, English, heterosexual, football loving, working class man with a wife, two children and a keen interest in British history. I've lived in Norwich like you, London like you and have also spent some time abroad. So as you can see, if you forget our obvious age difference, we've got a fair bit in common. Bearing that in mine, the one thing I can't understand is this. What one factor is causing you to believe that our country needs saving by the BNP that is obviously missing in me? How can i answer you're question? If we all thought the same [like some people on this thread would like us to] it would be pointless. Yes our backgrounds may be similar but i have many friends from all backgrounds and some agree some dont, i think you'll find its called choice and opinion.    Report

15/01/2008, 3:11 PM Arthur Whittle Joined on 12/07/2007 Boycotting The Coachmakers, after Roys shananagans Posts 2,560 Re: How sad shack, how sad.  jas the barclay king wrote: wonder if Arthur has a picture of Hitler beside the bed? jas :) No sorry and I've no time for Hitler. Do you have a nice piccy of George Galloway? You miss the fine line between Racism and patriotism, its a common mistake made by the younger generations after constantly being told its bad to be British.    Report

Page 21 of 26 (385 items) « First ... < 19 20 21 22 23 > ... Last »

pink'un » Have Your Say » It's not just f... » Re: Arthur ignoring the facts yet again!

(Quick links) Forums Home |- Search Forums |- Active Topics |- Unanswered Posts User Options |- Sign In |- Join this community |- Forgot Password Have Your Say |- Announcement |- Main Discussion - Norwich City |-- Transfer Talk |- Other football |-- Huckerby at San Jose |- King's Lynn and Local Leagues |- It's not just football! |- User Polls Football Community |- Looking for a club or player? |- Noticeboard |- Football Chants |- Team-mates