|
|
Main Discussion - Norwich City
Topic has 32 replies.
 
 
|
|
Sort Posts:
|
|
|
|
06/10/2008, 2:05 AM
|
Houston Canary
Joined on 13/01/2008
yee haw, Houston TX
Posts 1,187
|
|
|
|
Plus, I've heard Huckerby took quite a wage drop to play - A J
I've seen it in PinkUn stories several times where Huckerby said he has more than enough money, so wages were not the deciding factor in him going to the US. He obviously loves his job, and would have played for us for less than he was making previously if given the chance. He wasn't.
He is like a big time movie star who works for the union rate to be in a small time low budget movie because it is a good movie. He would have worked for us for less, although I am sure he would still insist on it being a fair wage to avoid being taken advantage of and being appreciated.
2 men say they're Jesus, one of them MUST be wrong
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
06/10/2008, 1:42 PM
|
Picto2007

Joined on 22/01/2004
Posts 120
|
|
|
We miss Hucks its as simple as that. I used to look forward to watching Norwich even if we were the underdogs in a game. You knew what Hucks was capable of and he could win you games when they looked dead and buried. I have heard the man was a complete arrogant tit off the pitch, but on it he was a great player. I for one would love to see him back in the team.
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
06/10/2008, 2:16 PM
|
BringBackIwan

Joined on 17/04/2008
Dereham
Posts 33
|
|
|
Why does everyone say we couldn't afford Hucks' wages, when he was never actually offered a new contract ? Who knows what he would have accepted ? Hearing the great man speak about his beloved Norwich City, I suspect he may well have played for a packet of crisps & a Mars Bar.
Perhaps someone could also tell me why we can't afford to pay Hucks' wages, but we are quite prepared to get someone in on loan & let him sit in the stands & do naff all ? Now, there's a waste of money !
"We don't need another hero . . . . . " Hang about, yes we do. Where are they Mr Roeder ?
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
06/10/2008, 2:22 PM
|
AndyJR

Joined on 16/10/2007
Posts 2,096
|
|
|
I think it was more a case that Roeder wanted to start afresh which was fairly understandable although I did'nt agree with the decision. Now things aren't rosy, it was inevitable the decision would come back to haunt him. I for one would never have let him go but gone he has.
The Kid's are o.k, at the Horse & Dray.
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
06/10/2008, 2:24 PM
|
Seaman Staines
Joined on 01/07/2008
Down the rubbedy - The best place to be!
Posts 462
|
|
|
For Hucks sake! We miss you Hucks!
I think we agree, the past is over. Whatever you do, don't misunderestimate me!
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
07/10/2008, 6:50 PM
|
The Saturday Boy

Joined on 18/02/2007
Naarwich
Posts 77
|
|
|
Wasn't Hucks here last year when we had a worst start than this one?
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
07/10/2008, 6:58 PM
|
NCFC_Shaun

Joined on 22/12/2006
Norwich
Posts 1,915
|
|
|
The Saturday Boy wrote: | Wasn't Hucks here last year when we had a worst start than this one?
|
|
No. He was injured....
Next.
Come On Noz!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
07/10/2008, 8:25 PM
|
Lambo

Joined on 23/04/2006
Diss/Lowestoft
Posts 201
|
|
|
He shouldn't have been playing though, he was never properly fit until the 2nd half of the season.
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2 of 3 (33 items)
|
< 1 2 3 > |
|
|
|
pink'un » Have Your Say » Main Discussion... » Hucks we miss you!
|
|
|
|